<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Meghan Houser on Vegas Harmon</title>
    <link>https://vegasharmon.com/authors/meghan-houser/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Meghan Houser on Vegas Harmon</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://vegasharmon.com/authors/meghan-houser/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>AI cannot show us something new</title>
      <link>https://vegasharmon.com/commonplace/ai-cannot-show-us-something-new/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://vegasharmon.com/commonplace/ai-cannot-show-us-something-new/</guid>
      <description>Is the new AI a useful tool? Yes, a tool with many uses. It can help us code faster and be our concierge, our stenographer, and so on. It can turn the value-neutral dials technology has manned since the Industrial Revolution: efficiency, automation. But to answer Paul Ford’s old question: What can this thing do, what is it promising, that isn’t just an optimized version of already extant processes? Its promise is to finally personalize the Algorithm — to fix all its alienation factors, to make it the thing that gives us what we really want.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
