<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Humans Are Magnificent on Vegas Harmon</title>
    <link>https://vegasharmon.com/works/humans-are-magnificent/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Humans Are Magnificent on Vegas Harmon</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://vegasharmon.com/works/humans-are-magnificent/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Lookup Without Understanding</title>
      <link>https://vegasharmon.com/commonplace/lookup-without-understanding/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://vegasharmon.com/commonplace/lookup-without-understanding/</guid>
      <description>“Artificial intelligence” is no more intelligent than a pocket calculator or a library: just because both can be used to quickly find something out, it does not mean that there is an intelligence there that understands something.&#xA;This seems wrong. But why? The first reason that comes to mind is that AI is not as passive as a calculator or library. In contrast to a calculator, an LLM&amp;rsquo;s outputs are underspecified by human inputs.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
